Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable

Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable

1) That the rate of decay happens to be constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances within the specimen dated haven’t been modified during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that after the stone first formed it included an understood amount of child product (“Radioisotopes and also the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)

We should observe that processes that are past never be occurring at all today, and therefore some could have occurred at prices and intensities far not the same as comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)

Jesus cursed the floor (the stones too!)

See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed could be the ground for the benefit”

If this occurred there was clearly a burst of radioactity that made the stones look over the age of these were.

Would not this make most of the rocks look the age that is same?

“The stone real question is quite simple and it has related to the elements that are basic made these stones at first. Whenever every one of these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it could simply be normal to allow them to act based on their specific properties, ultimately acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices.

Leer másDating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable